A man grieving his late celebrity mother is confronted with her image once more when she materializes as a singing hologram in his childhood home. In Sweetwater, a 21‑minute short backed by Google, that uncanny moment becomes the springboard for a meditation on whether technology can offer solace in an age of synthetic replicas and AI‑driven memories. The company premiered the film at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures, where industry guests watched Michael Keaton and Kyra Sedgwick lead a story co‑commissioned with Range Media Partners. For Google, which owns YouTube and is both a major investor in Anthropic and a developer of its own systems such as Gemini and Project Astra, the project also functions as soft advocacy at a time when AI firms are under legal and political pressure over alleged copyright abuses in the arts.
Hollywood is wrestling with many of the same anxieties as other creative industries, as film-makers, performers, and artists warn about copyright breaches, fair pay, and the prospect of AI systems edging them out of work. Advances in generative tools now allow studios and tech firms to resurrect actors, writers, and musicians as digital replicas, while chatbots are already being pressed into service by some users as ersatz therapists. Silicon Valley insists its AI products are designed to support, not supplant, human creativity, and Google’s tools do not feature in Sweetwater, despite the company’s own AI-driven holographic communication technology. The public remains deeply ambivalent: a recent Pew Research Center survey found a narrow majority of Americans believe AI will damage people’s ability to think creatively, with only a small minority convinced it will enhance it, and many undecided.
GLIU AI and Visual Arts is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The Digital Afterlife of Dead Celebrities
Zelda Williams, daughter of the late comedian Robin Williams, has appealed to fans to stop sending her AI-generated recreations of her father, condemning them as a disturbing misuse of his image and legacy. OpenAI has meanwhile halted the use of its Sora video tool to create clips of Martin Luther King Jr, after a wave of deepfakes showed the civil rights leader in disrespectful and sometimes racist scenarios, including fabricated confrontations with fellow activist Malcolm X.
Such “digital reincarnations” that involve AI to create a digital avatar of a dead person are on the rise, leaving loved ones, who are already dealing with grief, feeling disturbed. While people like O’Donnell and Williams are horrified by seeing AI-generated versions of their loved ones who passed away, others look for comfort in so-called “griefbots.” Posthumous publicity rights in places such as California and New York apply only to commercial use, covering the exploitation of a dead person’s image or likeness in advertising or other forms of trade.
Character.ai blocks teenagers from chatting with its AI bots amid safety concerns
The California-based company, founded in 2021, has attracted millions of users who use its AI bots to simulate conversations ranging from the playful to the deeply personal. But the platform has come under increasing scrutiny in the United States, where parents are suing the company after alleged harmful interactions between teenagers and AI companions. One lawsuit, filed after the death of a teenager, described Character.ai as a “clear and present danger” to young people.
From 25 November, anyone under the age of 18 will lose access to the chat function. Teen users will instead be limited to generating static or visual content, such as short videos featuring their virtual characters, but without conversational interaction. In a statement, Character.ai said it was restricting use after “reports and feedback from regulators, safety experts, and parents” raised concerns over the nature of some exchanges between its chatbots and younger users. Online safety campaigners have cautiously welcomed the decision, though many argue the ban comes too late. Digital rights advocates say conversational AI tools, which can mimic empathy, offer encouragement, and occasionally produce fabricated or emotionally manipulative responses, present particular risks to vulnerable youths.
Character.ai’s chief executive has defended the company’s decision to limit teen access to its chatbots, saying the new direction will prioritise safety and more structured digital experiences for younger users, according to the BBC. Mr Anand said the company’s new focus was on providing “even deeper gameplay [and] role‑play storytelling” features for teens, adding these would be “far safer than what they might be able to do with an open‑ended bot”, according to the BBC.
The digital immortality industry is set for significant growth
The digital immortality market is predicted to increase from $27.3 billion in 2024 to $31.24 billion by 2025. This rapid expansion is driven by demand for affordable and scalable solutions, ongoing digital innovation, and the rising need for advanced therapeutic options. Looking further ahead, the market is expected to reach $53.54 billion by 2029. Key factors behind this sustained growth include the broader adoption of virtual and augmented reality technologies, advances in personalized medicine, and the rising prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases. The convergence of virtual reality with brain-computer interfaces for rehabilitation, increased use of the Internet of Things in monitoring production environments, and the launch of innovative products supported by strategic partnerships are also shaping the industry’s future. This evolution suggests the digital immortality sector will continue to expand as technological breakthroughs and new applications open up further opportunities, meeting growing demand across healthcare and entertainment platforms.
AI clones lead charge in digital immortality market. Leading companies in the digital immortality sector are racing to perfect technologies such as digital AI clones, which create personalized virtual alter egos that capture an individual’s personality, memories, and behavioural responses. These AI-driven replicas mimic a person’s speech, mannerisms, character, and decision-making processes.
“Which Companies Are Leading the Charge in Digital Immortality Market Innovation? Major companies operating in the digital immortality market are Atos SE, Neuralink Corporation, Synthesia, Genies Inc., HeyGen, Soul Machines, Touchcast, DeepBrain AI, MindBank AI Inc., Sensay Inc., Nectome, Somnium Space, UneeQ, HereAfter AI, Eternos, Eter9 AI, Eternalized AI, Rememory AI Inc., Soul Vault AI Inc., UNITH.”
The Digital Afterlife of Dead Relatives
An advert for one such service, 2Wai, recently drew outrage after showing users chatting with an AI avatar of a dead relative, prompting inevitable comparisons with the dystopian visions of Black Mirror. AI ethicists describe so-called “griefbots” as an ethical minefield, warning that people in mourning may form intense attachments to digital replicas and become vulnerable to manipulation, much as has been seen with the boom in AI “boyfriends” and companions. Psychologists caution that these systems risk distorting the grieving process, delaying acceptance of loss, and, in some cases, turning mourning into a form of dependency or addiction.
